Amendment to Restore $51 Million to Math and Science Partnership Program Passed

Share This

Share/Save
Publication date: 
29 June 2012
Number: 
94

The American Institute of  Physics was among over 50 organizations, including the American Association of  Physics Teachers, the American Geophysical Union, APS Physics, and The Optical  Society which supported an amendment,  introduced by Senator Richard Shelby (R-AL) restoring $51 million in proposed  cuts to the FY 2013 budget for the Mathematics and Science Partnerships (MSP) program at the Department of Education.   The MSP program is the only Department of  Education program specifically aimed at enhancing science, technology,  engineering, and mathematics (STEM) teacher training and content  knowledge. 

Proposed MSP program  funding had been cut by $51 million from the current level by the Labor, Health  and Human Services, and Education Appropriations Subcommittee, reducing the  funding level from $150 million to $99 million.   The $158.8 billion bill passed out of the subcommittee by a vote of 10 –  7 along party lines. 

Senators on both sides of  the aisle were opposed to cuts to the MSP program.  The leadership of the Appropriations  Committee included Shelby’s amendment to restore funding to $150 million, the  same level as FY 2012.  The funding  restored for the MSP program corresponds with an equal reduction to the Race to the Top program.  However, the Race to the Top  program will receive the same funding of $549 million, as it did in FY 2012.  The final bill was approved by the full  Appropriations Committee. 

It appears that the $51  million potential cut was an attempt to allow the MSP program to move from the  current formula grant system, where each state receives proportionate funding,  to a competitive grant system where each state would compete for grant money.  The Elementary and Secondary Education Act  contains a provision that stipulates that if MSP program funding drops below  $100 million, the funding for that program would be distributed on a  competitive rather than formula basis.  Under  a competitive grant system, the value of each grant would be higher but the  number of grants awarded would be lower, likely approximately 10-12 grants  would be issued.  Management of the  competitive grant process would fall to the Department of Education, which  would have more control over the issuing of the grants.  Under a formula grants system, each of the 50  states would receive funding for STEM-related teacher training. 

While the Senate  Appropriations Committee recommended in their report that  the MSP program receive $150 million in funding, the FY 2013 request from  President Obama included no funds for this program.  The President’s FY 2013 request did include  funding for the Effective Teaching and Learning: STEM school improvement  program as well as an increase of $324 million for the Race to the Top  program.  Those programs each operate  under a competitive grant system.  The  Committee recommended no funding for the Effective Teaching and Learning: STEM  program and no increase in funding for the Race to the Top program. 

The Senate Appropriations  Committee Report for the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services,  Education and Related Agencies includes recommendations for science,  technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) programs:

“Mathematics and Science Partnerships

“The Committee recommends $149,716,000, the same as the comparable fiscal  year 2012 level, for the mathematics and science partnerships program. The [Administration’s]  budget request does not include any funding for this [MSP] program but instead  proposes $149,716,000 for a new Effective Teaching and Learning: STEM program.

“The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) requires that when the  appropriation for this program is higher than $100,000,000, the funds are to be  distributed to States by formula. The Committee has been concerned that at  recent appropriations levels, this funding has been spread too thinly among the  States to make a significant impact.

“At the recommended funding level, the ESEA requires the Department to make  competitive awards to eligible partnerships, which must include an engineering,  math, or science department of an institution of higher learning and a  high-need [Local Education Agencies] LEA. Partnerships will seek to improve the  performance of students in the areas of math and science, including  engineering, by bringing math and science teachers in elementary and secondary  schools together with scientists, mathematicians, and engineers to increase the  teachers' subject-matter knowledge and improve their teaching skills.

“The Committee notes that it is including additional resources under [the  Frontiers in Education Agency] FIE to create a new, evidence-based grant  competition jointly administered by the Department and NSF that will focus on  developing, evaluating, and scaling-up effective practices that can help increase  student achievement in mathematics, and for related activities.

“Effective Teaching and Learning: Science, Technology, Engineering, and  Mathematics

“The Committee recommends no funds for the proposed Effective Teaching and  Learning: STEM program. The budget request is $149,716,000. Activities  supported under this proposed program are instead funded under current law.

“The Effective Teaching and Learning: STEM would provide competitive grants  to [State Education Agencies] SEAs, or SEAs in partnership with appropriate  outside entities, to support State and local efforts to implement a  comprehensive strategy for the provision of high-quality STEM instruction and  support to students from preschool through grade 12.

“Fund for the Improvement of Education

“The Committee recommends an appropriation of $85,735,000 for FIE. The  fiscal year 2012 appropriation is $65,775,000 and the budget request is  $36,276,000 for this purpose.

“The Committee recommendation also includes  $19,235,000 for a new STEM initiative. A portion of these funds will be used  jointly with funds provided to NSF for a program using a tiered-evidence model,  similar to the Investing in Innovation program, that seeks to develop,  evaluate, and scale-up proven practices that can help improve teaching and  learning in mathematics. Another portion of the funds for this initiative will  be used for STEM-related activities at IES to improve the evidence base for  STEM programs across the Federal Government; this portion may also be used for providing  technical assistance to other Federal agencies and the field to improve  evaluations.”

Explore FYI topics: